i think man law is clear about this sort of thing.
It involves the pot and the kettle concept.
But there's extenuating circumstances here.
is coworker b in fact stating the superiority of the Camry over the scion? or has coworker B simply not realized the faux pas and forgotten the Camry's inadequacy.
When it all comes down to it, coworker b should not have attacked coworker a's car. I believe all of this can be settled with a beer. I find coworker b guilty of suspiciously unmanly behavior and move that coworker b to buy a beer for cowrker a.
nothing fruity.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Question of man law.
Collapse
X
-
Question of man law.
21Yes33.33%7No - it violates man law.66.67%14This is very important.
Coworker A and Coworker B are discussing a speeding ticket that A got in his Scion XB. B says 'Can you even get a speeding ticket in a Scion, it's a park bench!'.
B drives a '98 Camry.
The question is this, can B talk trash about A's car regarding performance based on man law?Tags: None
Leave a comment: