Bill Whittle on Obama.

[LMS]

I love this, and couldn't agree with him more. Obama is the worst thing to ever happen to this country.

[YOUTUBE]Y-FGgoReyNE[/YOUTUBE]

I had wanted Ron Paul to do better, but I am ready to vote for anyone over Obama at this point even if Romney is only a little better. There is just far to much damage to be done by this fucktard Obama if he gets a second term.

[Guest]

"utterly joyous romp in the park"

[Guest]

"or optimus prime" lolololololololololol

[Scary Guy]

I don't know, Obama does scare me, but not as much as those fundie fucktards. If Paul doesn't get the primary I'm voting libertarian. Although the system is so broken and corrupt I don't even know why I bother.

[sgath92]

I love this, and couldn't agree with him more. Obama is the worst thing to ever happen to this country.

[YOUTUBE]Y-FGgoReyNE[/YOUTUBE]

I had wanted Ron Paul to do better, but I am ready to vote for anyone over Obama at this point even if Romney is only a little better. There is just far to much damage to be done by this fucktard Obama if he gets a second term.

I see two things in that video that I can't ignore:

First let me say I really don't like Holder. At all. But, Operation Fast & Furious was part of a DOJ scheme that predates the Obama Admin by a few years. If the DOJ is anything like the other federal agencies I would bet that they wanted to create a crisis to use to attack gun ownership while simultaneously increasing their budgets & authority. Bureaucracies like the DOJ [while somewhat directed by the presidency] are actually fairly independently operated because so much of their staff are bureaucratic lifers who'll be in their authoritative positions long before & after any given president's reign. They know what will be good for their agency [which is not the same as what is good for the country] and they're going to do what they can to get away with it. Obama's fault in this is in not doing something about it, i.e. trying to stop it. Not creating it.

Also, the birth certificate issue is irrelevant. It doesn't matter where Obama was born since in order to attend public school om Malaysia he had to be formally & legally adopted by a Malaysian citizen in order to become a citizen over there [since their schools do not enroll non-critizen legal residents]. This means Obama lost his citizenship by emigrating to Malaysia, and therefore lost his ability to run for the US presidency in his early childhood.

However I think the spirit of the video is more than reasonable & accurate. Unfortunately the only people who have any chance at beating him in Nov are dangerously pandering to the fundamentalist religious right. If the predictions of our country's future economy is anything to go off of the last thing we need are more people who can't even support themselves giving birth to kids [instead of using contraceptives or abortions], or worse yet: people giving birth to kids who they're unwilling to be a parent to. This urban problem of parental apathy has started to cause major violent crime problems, including Philly's infamous flash mob robberies which has not only beat the weak, disabled, and elderly to an inch of their lives but was the inspiration behind the London Riot of last year [a reason why, following the riot the London police came to the US to talk to our law enforcement in Philly, DC, and LA to discuss their options in re-civilizing their roaming hoards of parentless, unsupervised children]. Just because you have the physical means to have a kid, doesn't mean you should. There is practically no accountability in parenting [unless you're not biologically the parent], and the responsible members of society have to deal with the consequences of this on a daily basis as violent "teenagers"& young adults break into their homes, mug people at gunpoint, or beat up strangers in public purely for sport. About 15 to 20 years after Roe v Wade our violent crime stats started to trend down. Any guess why? When abortion access became easy parents started aborting kids they didn't want, and by the late 80s into the 90s these unwanted kids would have been in that teenage to early 20s demographic that is most responsible for violent crime. Kids who are actually parented [meaning wanted by their parents] are less likely to engage in this behavior.

Perhaps adoption would be a viable alternative. However as it currently works the people who should least have kids are able to produce as many as they can biologically pop out, and the ones who would make great parents are only often able to adopt if they are rich enough to pass all the financial hurdles the system has put in place.

The religious right "solution" is to tell people to "just say no" to sex in these cases. Which'll work as well as it did when the religious groups got alcohol prohibition, or as well as drug prohibition is working [or more accurately: isn't] right now.