Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Auto Posted: MONSTER TRUCK FIRE HEARSE ~ early Austin ART CAR by Scott Prescott (Det

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Auto Posted: MONSTER TRUCK FIRE HEARSE ~ early Austin ART CAR by Scott Prescott (Det

    Up for sale here is an Art Car that was built in the 1980's by a CCS (Center for Creative Studies) class taught by Scott Prescott, who was a visiting instructor from Texas where he was soon to be partly responsible for the eighties art car explosion and its later popularity with the industrial arts crowd. Scott Prescott went on to build many other such cars, entering vehicles into the Austin Art Car Parade. Later vehicles took on a more militaristic appearance, but this early art car is more monstrous than military.

    The Flame Hearse is constructed of a 1940's Dodge Hearse Flower Truck upper body welded to the chassis of a ten-wheel truck. This thing is truly enormous. The front grill and engine compartment have been cut out to create a gaping mouth with chrome bumpers cut as fangs. The entire truck is run with pipes that carry propane to slits which can be ignited to supply fire to nearly every portion of the vehicle. The truck has been modified to be ignited inside & out, with flame lines run throughout the gaping mouth but also along the front dashboard and both side windows, as well as a line across the back window. Each of these lines can be shut down with its' own valve, and work is needed on the system, but fire can be produced both inside & out when hooked up to a propane tank. I usually use a 100 pound tank and fill up at a welders supply. The flames are strongest when the tank is full, and a regulator should be installed for greater effect. The truck needs some renovation, especially a tire change as one in front caught fire - but there's a spare in back so this shouldn't be too bad. The windshield has broken from fire, but I've been told this was a regular occurence, especially when hotter gases were used, and spares were kept on hand when it was displayed at the college it was built at.

    I acquired the Flame Hearse more than ten years ago from a storage space that CCS rented for about fifteen years. Before that it was on display at the college, but this would have been in the eighties after it was built. I have assembled some supporting materials relating to its construction. A South End article gives some background on the artist, and an early eighties comic book that supposedly was the trucks inspiration has been promised to me by an area artist who has memories of the project. Several rumors surround the Hearse, including that the Truck was originally called the "Ghettoblaster", and that the Hearse was the very one used to carry Henry Ford to his grave. I have substantiated neither of these, but the latter seems very unlikely, as the hearse is not a Ford vehicle.

    Here are a few links that relate to the artist Scott Prescott :

    Hundreds of pictures of art cars doing everything from art car ballet to art car cacophony. Pictures and Stories represent the lore of the art car and is the best of the Art Cars in Cyberspace web site.




    Take a look at the photos & feel free to email with any questions.

    $3000 OR Best Offer (all offers will be considered, identical offers will favor the earliest email).
    Local pickup only - Tow will require flatbed truck at purchasers expense - I'm located in Detroit.

    More...

  • #2
    oooooookay...

    Comment


    • #3
      That is not a 1940's Dodge Hearse.

      Comment


      • #4
        Oughta ask about the weight, that's about $195 a ton.

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by spastic_chicken View Post
          That is not a 1940's Dodge Hearse.
          nope , definetly a cadillac looks 1953 or older to me

          Comment


          • #6
            I have assembled some supporting materials relating to its construction.
            Or not. Obviously it is a Cadillac.

            Although pictures are small, there does not appear to be a back up lens under the taillights. Those stainless skirts under the taillights make this a '49 or '50 Superior. Too much missing off the front to differentiate. Hood also dictates that it isn't a '48.

            And IF those hints of shine on the back sides are $1k rear quarter spears poking out from shoddy conversion work... Well, it is most definitely a '49.

            I'd like to take this moment and apologize on behalf of all Austinites.
            Last edited by 60Crown; 12-15-2010, 11:52 PM.

            Comment


            • #7
              Idk... I'd rather have it over an ecto..

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by spastic_chicken View Post
                Idk... I'd rather have it over an ecto..
                That is because you are an idiot.

                Even if you hate accurate Ectos, they could always be downgraded to a '59 with a minimul amount of work....this is a rusted out heavily body modded example of mun (Mun-noun: The stuff that comes out of a pregnant woman after you kick her in the stomach)

                In fact, if you get $3,000 for this I'll....no wait people are stupid...Chris DiGanci will suck your dick. (because I'm holding him at gunpoint and/or he thinks you're a handsome fella.)

                Comment


                • #9
                  Chase, you leave the site for an extended period of time then return lost in translation.

                  Allow me to assist: You're the only one that incorrectly assumed he meant a '59 based Ecto. The rest understood that as horrid Ecto clones, perversions of nature, that litter the intraweb as Scott intended.

                  Resume trite rambling self-reflecting cockgobbling canal pal analogies at will.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Yah, wow. A little harsh. I thought you were on the same page as the rest of us... And to think, I voted for you on that news anchor thing..

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by Atti View Post
                      Chase, you leave the site for an extended period of time then return lost in translation.

                      Allow me to assist: You're the only one that incorrectly assumed he meant a '59 based Ecto. The rest understood that as horrid Ecto clones, perversions of nature, that litter the intraweb as Scott intended.

                      Resume trite rambling self-reflecting cockgobbling canal pal analogies at will.


                      Also, who the Hell is Chase?

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by Chace View Post
                        That is because you are an idiot.

                        Even if you hate accurate Ectos, they could always be downgraded to a '59 with a minimul amount of work....this is a rusted out heavily body modded example of mun (Mun-noun: The stuff that comes out of a pregnant woman after you kick her in the stomach)

                        In fact, if you get $3,000 for this I'll....no wait people are stupid...Chris DiGanci will suck your dick. (because I'm holding him at gunpoint and/or he thinks you're a handsome fella.)
                        You will be infested with carnivorous scrotum mites for this

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by Psychoholic View Post
                          You will be infested with carnivorous scrotum mites for this
                          ... but you're not saying no, correct?

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by v8nightmare View Post
                            ... but you're not saying no, correct?

                            I didn't hear a no.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Sweet, sounds like I'm still getting a blowjob.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X